Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 10, 2011, at 1:15 PM, james woodyatt wrote:

> On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
>> 
>> We have data that clearly shows that Mac OS 10.6.4, which uses 6to4 by default...
> 
> I don't want anybody to be misled by this statement.  I think what Lorenzo meant to say is that Mac OS X 10.6.4 and earlier doesn't implement the policy table in I-D.ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise, which prefers IPv4 source addresses over 2002::/16 IPv6 source addresses.
> 
> Mac OS X has *never* used 6to4 by default.  The scenario Lorenzo is talking about is where a router is advertising a 6to4 prefix onto a native IPv6 link.  On those links, Mac OS X 10.6.4 and earlier will treat 6to4 prefixes equivalently to any other IPv6 prefix when making address selection decisions.

thanks for clearing that up.  I was pretty sure it wasn't true, but you saved me the trouble of reinstalling 10.6.4 to prove it.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]