On Jun 9, 2011, at 18:47 , Masataka Ohta wrote: > james woodyatt wrote: >> >> I need *native* IPv6 into my home in San Francisco for my day job, > > Really? Very very very few people have day jobs that require native IPv6 service to their home network today. I'm an exception because I have a requirement that IPv6 and IPv4 provide more or less *equivalent* performance characteristics. The extra 20 milliseconds of queuing delay caused by the 6over4 tunnel endpoint should be acceptable to almost everyone else, but it's a deal-breaker for me. For reasons I'm not going to discuss here, I need IPv6 to be at least as good if not better than IPv4-- today, not three years from now--- and I'm forced to leave my ISP over it. -- james woodyatt <jhw@xxxxxxxxx> member of technical staff, core os networking _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf