Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 9, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Roger Jørgensen wrote:

> I will claim our goal is native IPv6 along IPv4, and in the long run, IPv6 only.
> We don't need more tunneling of IPv6 over IPv4, that was okay 10years
> ago, maybe even 5 or 3 years ago.
> Now it is time to actual do the right thing and say "let's do it
> properly, let's do IPv6 native".

The time to actually do the right thing was also 10-15 years ago.  But native v6, for the most part, is still not here yet.  At least the ISPs are saying Real Soon Now, which is something.  But who knows what "Real Soon" means?   Until native IPv6 is actually here, where "here" means "everywhere", there is still a need to do tunneling of v6 over v4.

> ...and stop discussing yesterdays technology.

We're always discussing yesterday's technology.   IPv6 was approved in 1995, if I recall.  

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]