Re: Summary for IESG last call to 5892bis draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well, a little miscommunication; I had meant to send the summary to the APPSAWG where the document was discussed, but sending it to the IETF list is OK too. Since it's here, one comment:

On 6/8/11 2:04 AM, Jiankang YAO wrote:
----------------------------
issue4: Add the IANA IDNA registry or replace the old one?
[...]
*****We are waiting for John and Paul reaching the agreement about this issue*******

I think we have gotten agreement from folks (including but not limited to doc authors and ADs involved in the conversation) that we'll go ahead with this document and write a quick new document clarifying that what 5892 meant was that IANA should *add* a new table to the registry and (with the older one) label it as to from which version of Unicode the table was generated.

pr

--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]