On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > From: Martin Rex <mrex@xxxxxxx> >> >> Classification of 6to4 as historic is [in]appropriate use of the IETF process, because it would be a political .. statement. > > Well, we've never done _that_ before, have we? Wouldn't want to set an unfortunate precedent. I see no reason for IETF to avoid setting standards for layer-9 protocols. -- james woodyatt <jhw@xxxxxxxxx> member of technical staff, core os networking _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf