Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Thursday, June 02, 2011 17:51 -0500 Pete Resnick
<presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Agree, but producing such a "no one cares anymore" RFC and
>> getting it  through the process should be lightweight enough
>> already. It should  slide right through.

For better or worse, I don't believe that has been the
experience in recent years.

>> I hope we don't need
>> yet another special process  because our normal process is
>> too heavy.

> I have no strong opinion on what exactly we should do on this
> point, but the IESG can already do exactly what John wants
> with no change to process. (See the end of 2026 sec. 6.2.) We
> would just have to decide to do it.

My point exactly.

      john




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]