I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2011–5–29 IETF LC End Date: 2011–6–6 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC. Major issues: 1. I am not sure how the IANA consideration section is in-line with the IANA consideration section of RFC5892. Maybe some clarification text would be helpful. 2. The IANA registry for derived property value has RFC 5892, does this draft want to change the reference, how will it be done. I think that it relates also to the issue of whether this draft updates RFC 5892. Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: 1. In section 1 “of three code points that where allocated” should be were. |
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf