On May 26, 2011, at 4:19 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Dear IESG, > Is the intention that this document will update RFC 5892 or not? > The document does not contain a "Updates:" header but the draft name > suggests otherwise to me, hence my question. As document co-editor, let me say definitively: this document does *not* update RFC 5892. The filename is an artifact of the early consideration and, as you know, disappears once the document is published as an RFC. Note the information at <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-faltstrom-5892bis/>: this is what the IESG is going on. There is no mention of "updates" anywhere there. > If the document does not update RFC 5892 (or some other document), I > support publishing this document because it will not affect my > implementation of RFC 5892. It is always nice to hear support from actual implementers. :-) --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf