Hi Roni, My apologies, I completely missed your review. On 26/04/11 6:22 PM, "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > > Major issues: > > > Minor issues: > This is more out of curiosity > 1. Why not include it in draft-ietf-grow-mrt-14 I took the stance that the extended additions in geo-mrt may not be the norm in implementation and sliding the work into draft-ietf-grow-mrt will confuse more than help. > 2. Why is it an Informational RFC and not standard track like the mrt draft. > There was discussion at the time of making draft-ietf-grow-mrt informational. I took this on board and indeed as of a -14 draft-ietf-grow-mrt is informational > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. Need to expand MRT when first mentioned. > I believe these have been fixed in response to Dave Crocker's Apps Area Review. Cheers Terry _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf