On May 16, 2011 11:41 PM, <sthaug@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > How much longer does this list need to be to justify choosing better labels for this v6 dual-stack transition hack?
> >
> > returning different sets of resource records on the basis of the orgin of a query ala split horizon is not exactly new ground.
> >
> > By my observation, what is being done, satisfactorily
> > meets the dictionary definition of a whitelist. the term was uncontroversial in the dicussion leading up to the wglc. If it's really inapropiate that's cool but I'm frankly not convinced.
>
> Agreed. I see no good reason to change the use of "whitelist". Let's
> move on.
>
+1 for moving on
Cb
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@xxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf