On 13/May/11 09:15, SM wrote: > This document covers RFC 4871 (4871bis actually), RFC 5451 and RFC > 5617. The document specifies the circumstances under which the > capabilities discussed here are applicable. If the DKIM working group > decides on taking that path, it could ask for publication of the > document as Proposed Standard. +1, it seems to make more sense to call a PS PS rather than BCP. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf