Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/6/2011 2:29 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
Whether you are or not.., the only way to do this is to stop calling
them "RFC"s. Maybe we should have a "PROP" series for PS docs, and
only give them "RFC" numbers later, when they progress.

Well, you know, the "Not a Standard But Might Be One Later" really are
requesting comments.


seems like that is rather cumbersome phrasing for a label. perhaps we can come up with a term that is shorter but implies a similar status with regard to now and later.

hmmm.  what about the word 'proposed'?

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]