>I think he is saying that there is are _de facto_ criteria that are >neither called out in 2026 nor in this draft, and that those criteria >are the running code, so the documentation ought to be made to match. This suggests that perhaps we should rename "Proposed Standard" to "Not a Standard But Might Be One Later," promote the PS published under the overstrict rules to DS, and we're done. I'm not sure whether I'm serious or not. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf