On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: >> >> Network Working Group M. Westerlund >> Internet-Draft Ericsson >> Updates: >> 5245 >> (if approved) C. Perkins >> Intended status: Standards Track University of Glasgow >> Expires: September 29, 2011 March 28, 2011 >> > I don't see why the intended status for this document is Standards Track. Wouldn't Informational be enough? Could you please justify why have you chosen it? Just wanted to add my 2 cents that I agree this needs to be Standards Track as is is effectively a key part of standards track spec that got, uh, forgotten. Changes to this registration procedure need the standards track level of approval. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf