Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt> (IANA Registry for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Options) to Proposed Standard

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@xxxxxxxxx> · Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:22:52 +0300

    Hello,

    Some comments on this document, currently in Last Call.

      Network Working Group                                      M. Westerlund
Internet-Draft                                                  Ericsson
Updates: 5245 (if approved)                                   C. Perkins
Intended status: Standards Track                   University of Glasgow
Expires: September 29, 2011                               March 28, 2011

    I don't see why the intended status for this document is Standards
    Track.  Wouldn't Informational be enough?  Could you please justify
    why have you chosen it?

    Your registry description does not mention what is the precise name
        of the registry.  While everybody understands that
    is sands for ICE options, it would be useful to give IANA
    distinctive guidelines on its name (this is also required in
    RFC5226, Section 4.2, 1) in the list;
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226#section-4.2).

    From RFC 5226, also Section 4.2:

       5) Initial assignments and reservations.  Clear instructions
         should be provided to identify any initial assignments or
         registrations.  In addition, any ranges that are to be reserved
       for "Private Use", "Reserved", "Unassigned", etc. should be
         clearly indicated.

    Are there any initial assignments?  Your document mentions one
    option; shouldn't it be registered?

       A registration request MUST include the following information:

   [ . . . ]

    Shall this be mentioned as a registration template?

      o  Email and Address of the Contact person

    I think you should add the name of the contact person to the name of
    this field as well.

    I see, except some aforementioned issues, this document conforms to
    RFC 5226, particularly Section 4.2. 

    Thanks in advance for considering my comments.

    Mykyta Yevstifeyev

    28.04.2011 19:01, The IESG wrote:

      The IESG has received a request from the Multiparty Multimedia Session
Control WG (mmusic) to consider the following document:
- 'IANA Registry for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)
Options'
  <draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2011-05-12. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry/

No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf