06.04.2011 18:27, Russ Housley wrote:
This revision proposes a solution to the issue raised by Brian Carpenter about documents lingering at Draft Standard. Some people thought it was a problem. Others thought it did not matter. The proposed solution leaves the matter in the hands of the IESG.
I can hardly see my comments from 18 March
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg65911.html)
considered in -05. Are you planning to make any changes regarding this
in -06?
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Russ
Begin forwarded message:
From: IETF I-D Submission Tool<idsubmission@xxxxxxxx>
Date: April 6, 2011 11:22:25 AM EDT
To: housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx, eburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-05
A new version of I-D, draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-05.txt has been successfully submitted by Russ Housley and posted to the IETF repository.
Filename: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Revision: 05
Title: Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels
Creation_date: 2011-04-06
WG ID: Independent Submission
Number_of_pages: 7
Abstract:
This document proposes several changes to the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF) Standards Process defined in RFC 2026, primarily a
reduction from three IETF standards track maturity levels to two.
{{ RFC Editor: please change "proposes several changes to the" to
"changes the". }}
The IETF Secretariat.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf