Re: IETF and APIs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    Marc> On 03/29/2011 01:28 PM, Eric Burger wrote:
    >> Would we not be better off just asking (mandating?) at least one
    >> open source implementation?  That effort would produce a de facto
    >> API.

    Marc> What you need is a reference implementation (i.e. an
    Marc> inefficient but complete implementation, with a license that
    Marc> permits at least to see the source and generate a binary) AND
    Marc> a test suite.

Others have pointed out some of the issues with this approach.  However,
having been involved in a fairly widely used reference implementation
(MIT Kerberos) for over 10 years and having watched it try and evolve
from a reference implementation to a platform component, I do not
believe that  the sorts of things you want out of a reference
implementation are what you want out of a platform component. 

A reference implementation focuses on demonstrating a protocol and being
able to develop and debug that protocol and understand it.

A platform component focuses on extensibly making the aspects of the
protocol that can be building blocks available to the platform.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]