On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:33 AM, James M. Polk <jmpolk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
playing devil's advocate here...Brian
Say someone submits a request for an existing DS to the IESG and it takes 6 months (or 3 months) to get through the process, but only 2 months remain before the 2 year window is up (since this RFC was published). Does that grandfather the DS into "the process" - meaning that document is no longer subject to this 'within 2 year notice' rule?
I'm just saying that this appears to beg all DS editors to get their DS notifications into the IESG sooner rather than later, which is fine, but that also creates a heck of a workload on the IESG that they currently do not have, does it not?
Something is going to be impacted.
Make it a 2 year deadline for receiving requests. Problem solved.
Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf