Hello Cullen, Please seehttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-ion-report-01 that now updates RFC 4693 and makes *it* Historic. However I think Informational status would be OK for this document. Mykyta Yevstifeyev 2011/3/8, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx>: > > you might want the intended status of that draft to be "historic" not > "informative" > > On Mar 6, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I've just made the Internet-Draft containing some summary on IONs >> experiment available. You may find it here: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-ion-report-00 >> >> Any comments and suggestions are welcome. >> >> All the best, >> Mykyta Yevstifeyev >> >> 06.03.2011 22:11, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>> On 2011-03-07 00:15, Adrian Farrel wrote: >>>> Hi Mykyta, >>>> >>>> Please see >>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg04792.html >>>> >>>> Adrian >>> One could argue that >>> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/process-experiment.html >>> should also contain pointers, or at least a status line, for concluded >>> experiments. (It's my fault that it doesn't, since I created the original >>> version of that page.) >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf