Nurit: >> Not to mention including the canard that the IETF unilaterally disbanded >> "its group assigned to work with ITU" in 2009. Others with more detailed >> knowledge can explain exactly why this is, er, a lie. > > Here are some facts: > =================== > I was member of the MEAD team. > A meeting of the MEAD team was scheduled to meet in Munich > 12-14 October 2009. It was scheduled right after an ITU-T > SG15 plenary meeting (September 28 - October 9) because > MEAD team members attended that meeting too. > > On Friday October 2nd an agenda was distributed for the MEAD > team for the meeting in Munich on the MEAD team list mead@xxxxxxxxx > On Monday October 5th an email was sent to mead@xxxxxxxx > announcing the disbanding of the MEAD team, and that the > meeting in Munich should not be considered a MEAD team meeting. > > The decision to disband the MEAD team was liaised to the ITU-T > on the same day (October 5). > > Do I need to say more. It does not sound like the shutdown of the MEAD team was smooth. However, the closure of a design team when their output is being handled by a working group is quite normal. Russ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf