On 2011-03-02 01:29, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:18:12PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > >> FWIW, this came up in the dnsext working group a few years ago. In the >> end, I don't think anything was done, which is kind of a shame. > > Nothing was done for want of workers ;-) We concluded there was no > real room in official IETF channels for such a publication, I have asserted for some years that the "Applicability Statement" subset of the standards track, defined in RFC 2026, could perfectly well be used for explaining how a group of RFCs fit together. There have been various proposals for more specific methods than that which haven't caught on, but the real problem has already been mentioned: >>> Nothing was done for want of workers ;-) It is a lot of work. I've done it for IETF process RFCs and even that was a lot of work: http://www.ietf.org/about/process-docs.html Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf