Bob, Are recommendations actually published as BCP? I only see one BCP with "IPv6" in the title, published back in 2004. Compared to this, the ipv6ops working group alone has produced dozens of informational RFCs: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/ At least one of these are even explicitly recommendations: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4890/ Some are targeted at protocol developers, some at vendors, some at operators. It's quite a mixed bag. :) I'm not complaining, I just want to know if I am missing an obvious place. -- Shane On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 12:10 +0200, Bob Hinden wrote: > Shane, > > Like this one, aren't recommendations usually published as BCPs? > > Bob > > > On Feb 28, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: > > > All, > > > > I just happened to notice this document on ietf-announce today: > > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-server-logging-recommendations/ > > > > It seems quite reasonable. > > > > My question is... how is this advice expected to trickle out into actual > > use? There are more than 6000 RFCs, and they don't seem to be organized > > in a useful way that I can find. > > > > I ask because I was going to forward this to an IPv6 operations list, > > and thought "hm... what about the rest?" and I realized I did not know, > > and did not even know how to find out. > > > > Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks! > > > > -- > > Shane > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf