On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Doug Barton wrote: > I don't have anything intelligent to say about either RFP, but I'm > more concerned about the fact that the IAOC thought that releasing > them without wider community review was something that the community > would accept and/or tolerate. I first grew concerned about this with > the "network registration" donnybrook at the China IETF. I didn't > speak up then because I wasn't there, didn't know the details, and > figured that based on the response from both the community and the > IAOC that it was a lesson learned. For the record: THe network registration was announced BEFORE Maastricht and tested there, not in China. So, your statemenet is highly misleading. There were plenty of comments etc one whole meeting cycle ahead of time. If you are talking about the badge checking in Beijing, that's another matter, but also not an IAOC policy matter that was "planned". > > > Doug > > -- Ole J. Jacobsen Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal Cisco Systems Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628 E-mail: ole@xxxxxxxxx URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf