On Feb 21, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (not speaking for the authors, just observing some... also not > speaking as a co-chair) > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:23 AM, t.petch <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I find this I-D problematic. The subject matter is of crucial importance, >> comparable to, or perhaps more important than, IPv6, yet this I-D is not >> an easy read and there should be one such somewhere. >> > > I thought there was to be an overview doc as well produced, with the > goal being to lay out the basic parts referring to the other drafts > for further info/expansion. > >> sidr has produced an awesome collection of I-Ds (some now obsolete) but it is >> not obvious, short of spending a few months in the archives, how they fit >> together. Other major projects - snmp for example - produced an Introduction, >> acting as a starting point and a road map to the other I-Ds and I think that >> that should be a prerequisite for sidr. This I-D is not it (even if it could >> be); its Normative >> References include a further 80 pages of sidr I-Ds! >> >> One small example. The I-Ds have several references to RPKI and indeed, that >> appears in -arch; but it first appears on page 8 and is not even expanded, let > > eh.. that's a nit that someone should file... "hey, you can't use an > acronym for the first time without actually expanding it properly!" > > Can you cite the proper para/page/section on this so the authors can fix it? > Maybe if we tweaked the last sentence in section 2: Such a PKI, which is henceforth referred to as the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI), is a central component of this architecture. Spt > -Chris > >> alone explained. Of course you can turn to Wikipedia and you find a clear >> explanation of what RPKI is but you should not need Wikipedia to understand >> something as important as sidr. This I-D seems to be written to be understood >> by those who understand it:-( >> >> Tom Petch >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary at ietf.org> >> To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce at ietf.org> >> Cc: <sidr@xxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 5:14 PM >> Subject: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-arch-11.txt> (An Infrastructure to >> >> >>> >>> The IESG has received a request from the Secure Inter-Domain Routing WG >>> (sidr) to consider the following document: >>> - 'An Infrastructure to Support Secure Internet Routing' >>> <draft-ietf-sidr-arch-11.txt> as an Informational RFC >>> >>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >>> ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-02-21. Exceptionally, comments may be >>> sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the >>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >>> >>> The file can be obtained via >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-arch/ >>> >>> IESG discussion can be tracked via >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-arch/ >>> >>> >>> >>> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: >>> >>> /ipr/1204/ >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> sidr@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf