Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-xcon-common-data-model-23.txt> (Conference Information Data Model for Centralized Conferencing (XCON)) to Proposed Standard

[Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

As far as I know there was a request to review URI schemes defined in this document on uri-review list on 1 March 2010.  There were a few responses on it, but I'd like to comment these schemes' registration now, during the Last Call.

See my comments in-line.

9.3.  Conference Object Identifier Registration



 The IANA is requested to register the following URI scheme
 under the Permanent URI Schemes registry.

Here the informative reference to RFC 4395 might be appropriate.

 XCON-URI = "xcon" ":" [conf-object-id "@"] host [ ":" port ] [RFC xxxx]

  conf-object-id = 1*( unreserved / "+" / "=" / "/" )

You should have the normative reference to RFC 5234 here.  Moreover, here [RFC xxxx] may be treated as part of scheme definition.  I'd like to propose to remove it at all.

   host, port, and unreserved are defined in RFC3986[RFC3986]

I wonder why you have informative reference to RFC 3986.  If you import these rules, informative reading the document that defines them won't be enough.

   [Note to the RFC Editor: replace xxxx with the number this RFC gets
   assigned.]

    Subject: Request for XCON-URI Registration
    Person & email address to contact for further information:
         Oscar Novo <oscar novo_at_ericsson.com>
    Specification: RFC XXXX
    Author/Change Controller: IESG
    Comments:
        Identifies the Conference

As I know, RFC 4395 requires full registration template for Permanent registrations.  See here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#section-5.4

9.4.  Conference User Identifier Registration

Just the same comments - references to RFC 5234 and 4395, full template.

   The IANA is requested to register the following URI scheme
    under the Permanent URI Schemes registry.

    XCON-USERID = "xcon-userid" ":" conf-user-id  [ RFC xxxx ]

    conf-user-id = 1*(unreserved)

Here 'conf-user-id = 1*unreserved' would be better, IMO.

   unreserved is defined in RFC3986[RFC3986]

   [Note to the RFC Editor: replace xxxx with the number this RFC gets
   assigned.]



    Subject: Request for XCON-USERID Registration
    Person & email address to contact for further information:
         Oscar Novo <oscar novo_at_ericsson.com>
    Specification: RFC XXXX
    Author/Change Controller: IESG
    Comments:
        Identifies the User in the conference

Thank you in advance for considering my comments.

All the best,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev

19.02.2011 0:34, The IESG wrote:

The IESG has received a request from the Centralized Conferencing WG
(xcon) to consider the following document:
- 'Conference Information Data Model for Centralized Conferencing (XCON)'
  <draft-ietf-xcon-common-data-model-23.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2011-03-04. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xcon-common-data-model/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xcon-common-data-model/



No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf