I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api-15 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2011–2–1 IETF LC End Date: 2011–2–10 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: 1. In section 8.2 the path exploration parameters are different from RFC 5534, missing keep alive interval. Why the difference. 2. In section 11.1 you discuss conflict resolution for SHIM6, is this also relevant for HIP or is it a specific SHIM6 problem. This also relates to the issue of conflict resolution discussed in the security section. 3. The last sentence in appendix A “Any solution is needed to overcome the problem mentioned above” is not clear, does it mean that there is no solution to the context forking problem. Section 11.1 claims that using the procedure described it addresses this issue, am I missing something. Nits/editorial comments: 1. In 8.2 for pe_keepaliveto, what are the units, I assume it is seconds. 2. In section 7 section paragraph “in which one ore” should be “in which one or” |
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf