Re: prerequisite for change (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:27:17AM -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> The raising of the bar for proposed standard has a very simple reason: it is
> now almost impossible to change specifications once deployed.

That's an argument for _no_ maturity levels, then, not for two.

Not at all, many protocols are never successfully deployed.

In the case that a protocol is successfully deployed, the final protocol has frequently required major modification. Documenting those changes has value.


--
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]