prerequisite for change (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've previously expressed my opinion that proposals to muck with the
number of steps in teh IETF standards process will no do anything
useful (i.e., will not be effective) - JOhn and I have just posted
what, to us, would be a prerequisite for amy process mucking proposal
to succeed

Scott

-----
From: Internet-Drafts@xxxxxxxx
To: i-d-announce@xxxxxxxx
Subject: I-D Action:draft-bradner-restore-proposed-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

	Title           : Restoring Proposed Standard to Its Intended Use
	Author(s)       : J. Klensin, S. Bradner
	Filename        : draft-bradner-restore-proposed-00.txt
	Pages           : 6
	Date            : 2011-01-29

Restore the very low bar for Proposed Standard described in RFC 2026
(BCP 9)

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bradner-restore-proposed-00.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]