I wonder if this document should be instead Informational status. I
don't see here a protocol, more an implementation optimisation.
Marc.
Le 11-01-13 18:58, The IESG a écrit :
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Scalable Operation of Address Translators with Per-Interface Bindings'
<draft-arkko-dual-stack-extra-lite-03.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2011-02-10. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arkko-dual-stack-extra-lite/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arkko-dual-stack-extra-lite/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
--
=========
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN Implementation: http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf