Joe Salowey [mailto:jsalowey@xxxxxxxxx] writes: > Hi Glen, > > In reading the text and I'm not exactly sure where the confusion or > contradiction comes in. I think your suggested text is fine, but I'm > not sure how it improves things. If I understand your point correctly > accepting an SSL 2.0 hello as the first message in the TLS handshake is > an example of using at least part of SSL 2.0, so we should indicate that > this is an exception to the MUST NOT use SSL 2.0 directive. Is this > your concern? Yup. ... _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf