Re: Last Call: <draft-salowey-secsh-uri-00.txt> (Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Scheme for Secure Shell (SSH)) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Several things in this draft surprised me a bit thought nothing looked completely broken. I

You need an IANA registry for the parameters and a way new parameters get added

Do you need to say anything about encoding when the host name is an IPv6 address?

It says the fingerprint is in 4716 format but the examples have ssh-dss in them that does not look like that format. I would have expected they type of the fingerprint to be on the left not the right of the equal sign so instead of 

fingerprint=ssh-dss-c1-b1-30-29-d7-b8-de-6c-97-77-10-d7-46-41-63-87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I would have expected 

md5-fingerprint=c1-b1-30-29-d7-b8-de-6c-97-77-10-d7-46-41-63-87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I was surprised to see the c-param added to the user instead of the right hand side of URI 

so Instead of 
ssh://user;foo=bar@xxxxxxxxxxx

I would have expected
 ssh://user@xxxxxxxxxxx;foo=bar

I was surprised that the c-param required the equal so I can not have a parameter like  "useFooMode" but must instead have a parameter like "useFooMode=1"

I'd be interesting hearing the logic or why the "//" - I'll point out XMPP, SIP, email, etc don't see to have this 

GIven a major use of SSH is SCP, I wish this URI worked for file paths as well 

The draft says 
  This document is discussed on the IETF SSH list: ietf-ssh@xxxxxxxxxx

I realize that was the list for the closed WG but I don't think that is an IETF list. It is not under IETF rules and is not listedhttp://www.ietf.org/list/nonwg.html. I would highly suggest moving the conversation to an IETF list. 


On Nov 17, 2010, at 11:58 AM, The IESG wrote:

> 
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Scheme for Secure Shell (SSH)'
>  <draft-salowey-secsh-uri-00.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2010-12-15. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-salowey-secsh-uri/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-salowey-secsh-uri/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]