Doug Ewell wrote: > > Eliot Lear wrote: > > Is there is an unspoken concern in this discussion as to whether the > > host wanted to take names based on what people were saying, in the case > > they said something "objectionable"? > > Eliot Lear's question seems pertinent here. But you do realize that, it is often suggested that people in WG meetings and in the plenary state their name and affiliation before saying something, and that for a couple of years now, _all_ meetings use audio broadcast and are archived. Agreeably, stating your name and affiliation is considered a courtesy, and there is no "IETF Police" enforcing it, but people are regularly reminded of that courtesy. :) Protecting food and probably "temporarily parked" equipment while feeding, getting water or queuing for the mike seems like a concern, where the local host or hotel might be in a better position to perform risk management/assessment. So have the IAOC add a question to their questionary for meeting locations about the security concerns of the local host and hotel and their expected procedure to address them, so that this can be communicated ahead of the meeting, and be done with it (for this meeting) ? -Martin _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf