On 11/11/2010 10:17 PM, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
On 11/11/2010 12:01, Dave CROCKER wrote:
It is a change in practice. It is not a change in formal requirement.
This has (always?) been an unenforced requirement.(*)
No, I've been refused entry to the terminal room at least once because I did
not wear my badge. In some venues (Maastricht, Paris, and maybe others)
a badge was needed to enter the building early in the morning or late in
the evening.
Security on the terminal room is long-standing. It has equipment in it.
Meeting rooms are fundamentally different places and it is reasonable to apply a
fundamentally different security model.
It might also be reasonable to apply the same model, although the logic is
likely to involve different reasons.
The important point is that expanding the scope of a security mechanism from one
kind of environment to another really is a change in policy.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf