Perhaps I should have said deployable ... Although it is deployed in some places, and growing rapidly - I'd be surprised if your situation didn't change over then next 12-15 months ...
/TJ
On Oct 30, 2010 11:28 PM, "Michel Py" <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> TJ [trejrco@xxxxxxxxx] wrote:
>> I would be quite curious to know your definition of failure, given
> that
>> IPsec is currently deployed, and working in "more than a few"
> deployments
>> On a possibly related note, IPv6 use deployed and working too ...
>
> Failure means that, I leave in the capital city of California and I
> can't find a single ISP that offers native IPv6. We're in the end of
> 2010. And no change in sight. Tunnels? Oh yes tunnels. I had that 10
> years ago.
>
> You call that deployed?
>
> Michel.
>
>> TJ [trejrco@xxxxxxxxx] wrote:
>> I would be quite curious to know your definition of failure, given
> that
>> IPsec is currently deployed, and working in "more than a few"
> deployments
>> On a possibly related note, IPv6 use deployed and working too ...
>
> Failure means that, I leave in the capital city of California and I
> can't find a single ISP that offers native IPv6. We're in the end of
> 2010. And no change in sight. Tunnels? Oh yes tunnels. I had that 10
> years ago.
>
> You call that deployed?
>
> Michel.
>
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf