>>>>> "Eliot" == Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> The downside of Russ's draft is that it is possible that after
>> approving it we might find that nothing changes: Protocol
>> specifications still stay at Proposed Standard; The IESG still
>> takes a lot of time in approving a request to publish a proposed
>> standard RFC.
Eliot> How will we measure effect? And what other factors need to
Eliot> be controlled?
The obvious measure of number of IDs->PS is interesting.
But, perhaps the average length of time for ID-00 -> PS is more
important, overall to the entire discussion. That number needs to
additionally have a time point of WG LC, move to IESG and also IETF LC.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf