|
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For
background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last
Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req-08 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2010–10–25 IETF LC End Date: 2010–11–10 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an
Informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: 1.
In section 2 why not reference RFC 2119 or at
least copy the definition from RFC 2119 for the capitalized term. 2.
In section 3.9 when you say “if this technique
is used”, by this do you mean certificate –less or the flow defined
in the previous sentence. 3.
In section 4.6.3 the first paragraph defines the
requirements for Cryptographic Binding. It looks to me like the rest of the
section talks about a specific use case, so why is it in the requirements
section and not in section 3. Nits/editorial comments: |
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf