On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:
> I personally find section 5.1 unusually amusing as if now the IAB wants to
> say split-DNS "should be considered harmful". Leakage in to the public DNS
> .. geez really. Like what where are the examples of the harm? So who put
> ringtones in the DNS :-)
I am trying to understand where there are misunderstandings and differences in insight. And I think you might have read 5.1 different than intended:
It is not trying to speak about data that is leaked from "internal" to "public" DNS installs. But it tries to make a more generic point that solutions that are engineered for environments that are supposed to be closed will leak to the public Internet. With that comes a responsibility to design those solutions and protocols in such a way that they will have the appropriate security, privacy, and scalability properties.
?
--Olaf
(speaking for myself)
________________________________________________________
Olaf M. Kolkman NLnet Labs
Science Park 140,
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/ 1098 XG Amsterdam
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf