Re: can we please postpone the ipv6 post-mortem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Winter wrote:
> 
> > What capabilities there are available on the internet backbone
> > or what could be enabled on newer operating systems by sophisticated
> > end users doesn't matter much, if most of the "internet-enabled"
> > end user equipment, that is being sold to consumers, is still IPv4-only.
> 
> Windows 7: enabled by default. Mac OS: enabled by default. Linux: 
> whatever your distro does. I fail to see your point.

Windows XP: disabled by default.  Has been sold on the majority of
Netbooks well into 2010, and Netbooks were 1/3rd of the PC sales.

> 
> > What we desperately need is factory-enabled transparent
> > internetworking on all _NEW_ networking equipment and internet-enabled
> > gadgets and appliances.  As long as IPv4 and IPv6 are seperate worlds
> > the hen-and-egg stalemate is going to continue.  And the useful
> > lifetime of all brand-new IPv4-only equipment that is produced by
> > the electronic entertainment industry is about 5-15 years.
> 
> The main point that needs attention is router equipment, IMHO. There's a 
> Fritz!Box beta firmware for IPv6 right now; when it's final, pushing 
> that out will fix the deployment of IPv6 for most of Germany (as they 
> happen to be quite popular there).

IPv6-capable beta firmwares for Fritz DSL-routers exist only for the
two most recent models 7390 and 7270(v?).  Other models (like the 7112/7113)
or 7170, 7150) do *NOT* have sufficient resources to run IPv6 -- their
flash memory is close to full as well as their RAM when they're running.


-Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]