Hi Ben, On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Ben Campbell <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Ted Hardie wrote: > >> On the general clarity, I also have to say that I believe that the document >> tipped over the "diff" line somewhere. That is, as a set of edits it is now >> sufficiently complex that it would almost certainly be better to apply >> the edits and re-spin the whole document rather than provide a set of >> textual diffs in the current format. If the ADs and WG chairs feel that there >> is no energy to tackle such a major editorial change, however, I certainly >> understand. It is possible to build up the correct state with the two >> documents; >> it is just more difficult. > > Hi Ted, > > Do I understand correctly that you mean a respin of RFC 4975? > > Thanks! Yes, I do. But I understand if that is not practical at this point in time. regards, Ted > > Ben. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf