On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Ted Hardie wrote: > On the general clarity, I also have to say that I believe that the document > tipped over the "diff" line somewhere. That is, as a set of edits it is now > sufficiently complex that it would almost certainly be better to apply > the edits and re-spin the whole document rather than provide a set of > textual diffs in the current format. If the ADs and WG chairs feel that there > is no energy to tackle such a major editorial change, however, I certainly > understand. It is possible to build up the correct state with the two > documents; > it is just more difficult. Hi Ted, Do I understand correctly that you mean a respin of RFC 4975? Thanks! Ben. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf