Re: Why not use on-line tool to track each working group's attendees?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> 
> Depending on the popularity of your working group and the extent to
> which the meeting itself is timeshifted from the vantage point of the
> bulk of the remote participants, as much as 10% of of the partficipants
> might be remote, generally less, almost never more.

There is a difference in the effectiveness of remote vs. on-premise
participation.  In some WGs in the Security Area on-premise participants
join jabber, facilitating remote participation of the WG Meeting through
jabber (while listening to the audio stream) much easier.  I've been
doing this for most of the past 10 years.  Personally, I dislike WebEx.


Unfortunately, for IETF78, I was blocked from the audiostream, because
it was served through a port _other_ than 80/443, so it was unaccessible
through our company firewall.  I would appreciate if the audio streams
would be served through port 80 again on future meetings.


-Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]