Re: motivations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The fact remains that RFC 821 has the STANDARD imprimatur and the better
> specification that was intended to replace it does not.
>
> It seems pretty basic to me that when you declare a document Obsolete it
> should lose its STANDARD status. But under the current system that does not
> happen.

We could write a draft to move RFC 821 to Historic, though.  Then it
would lose its full standard status.  Are there any reasons not to do
that?

I don't think we want implementers to read RFC 821 except for historical
purposes, and instead want them to read RFC 5321.  Moving RFC 821 to
Historic would convey that message, I believe.

/Simon
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]