On Tue, April 27, 2010 3:23 am, Dean Anderson wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Nicolas Williams wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:18:33PM -0500, Marsh Ray wrote: >> > Taking ietf@xxxxxxxx off of CC list as this seems to be very TLS >> specific. >> >> This is an IETF LC, not a WG LC; IETF LC comments should be sent to >> ietf@xxxxxxxxx If anything, we might want to drop tls@xxxxxxxxx > > I cannot post to IETF@xxxxxxxx, for dishonest and apparently unlawful > reasons. I won the consensus call in the PR Action, but the consensus > was fraudulently reported. But the PR Action itself is not consistent > with the legal requirements to suspend member rights in a member > corporation: The law requires a vote of the membership, and that 51% of > the membership vote for the suspension/expulsion. There are other legal > issues (e.g. antitrust) involved with preventing corporations from > participating in a standards body, but I won't go into those here. > > However, fact remains that I cannot post to ietf@xxxxxxxxx All the more reason to drop tls@xxxxxxxx! Dan. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf