Re: another document categorization suggestion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 04/21/2010 05:55 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
> everyone--
> 
> After just now finding the root cause of yet another stupid
> interoperability problem to be an interaction between a client not
> choosing a sufficiently unique host/session identifier and a server
> being overly clever about using said identifiers for purposes other
> than intended in the protocol specification...
> 
> WHEREAS the IETF has no document category for dealing with material
> that is unfit for Standards Track, that does not in any way describe
> Best Current Practice, provides Information of questionable utility,
> which is neither yet limited to Historical interest nor of merely
> Experimental nature...
> 
> BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that IETF should create a new document category
> for Disinformation, and that RFC 2516 should immediately and with
> extreme prejudice be reclassified as such without further
> discussion.

I believe that we already have (dis)informational

> 
> -- james woodyatt <jhw@xxxxxxxxx> member of technical staff,
> communications engineering
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list 
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]