Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework (A Framework forMPLS in Transport Networks) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



3.4.1 says

"The data plane behaviour of MPLS-TP is the same as the best current
   practise for MPLS.  This includes the setting of the S-Bit.  "

Without a reference, or any detail, I think this can only muddy the waters.  How
do I know that your best practice is my best practice, or his?

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx>
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <mpls@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 4:33 PM
Subject: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework (A Framework forMPLS in
Transport Networks) to Informational RFC


> The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
> (mpls) to consider the following document:
>
> - 'A Framework for MPLS in Transport Networks '
>    <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-11.txt> as an Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2010-04-21. Exceptionally,
> comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please
> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-11.txt
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18027&rf
c_flag=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]