I think the ISO standard is fine. Multi-letter month abbreviations are probably OK but are a little different in different languages. Lets stick with 2010-01-02. Thanks, Donald On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cullen Jennings allegedly wrote on 03/13/2010 09:51 EST: >> >> I just got abused by someone reading the IESG web pages and pointing out dates like 2010-01-02 , are confusing. Is there a better way to do dates that we should be using on the ietf.org web pages? > > 2010-JAN-02 _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf