On 3/11/10 1:18 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I agree with Sam, for cases which would otherwise result in an
endless DISCUSS - although normally I'd expect the argument
to be complex enough that a separate RFC would be needed to
explain the dissent.
Brian,
Review the extensive defenses needed to guard against exploits and
problems due to naming uncertainty. A document emphasizing these
concerns might prove productive at instilling early action.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf