Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:42:12PM -0800, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> 
> The prudent action is to return it to the appellant, stating that it
> cannot be processed until it has been made clear and concise.

I fully support such an approach (and did propose the same strategy to the
IESG while I was a member of the IESG myself).

David Kessens
---
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]