Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 18, 2010, at 12:10 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> For you, your ISP is, representing the Internet, responsible for the proper delivery.

Your point?

You are aware, of course, that some ISPs are actively engaging in DNS response modification, right?

> To your surprise, reasonable security by network operators is
> not so new. Highly commercial telcos have been offering it for
> about 100 years.

Ignoring for a second that the Internet isn't the telephony system (intelligence in the network is in different places), there have been MITM attacks against the telephony system.

> Cache poisoning is a problem of poor implementations to handle
> additional information including glue.

No.

Cache poisoning is ALSO a result of the fact that the path between source and destination is not protected.

Regards,
-drc

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]