On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Simon Josefsson <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I object to publishing these IDNA documents as a Draft Standard. I > don't view IDNA2008 as a revision of the earlier IDNA2003 protocol. The > design goals have changed since the first IDNA version. Finally, there > have been little implementation experience with the new protocol. > > I would support publication as Proposed Standard. > You are absolutely correct and this is a pilot error on my part. I didn't notice the documents were automatically listed as going for Draft Standard in the tracking tools when I issued the Last Call. SM pointed out that the Last Call announcement mentioned implementation reports but I didn't realize what caused that error. I will look into fixing this and reissuing the Last Call announcements. Lisa _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf